Food
advertisements have a large effect on our lives. Whether you see them, hear
them, or experience them, these advertisements target you subconscious mindset
and it is utterly amazing how much thought companies put into drawing people
into their restaurants. Some of the best advertisements come from oligopoly
markets. Examples of these types of markets can be seen through Coke vs Pepsi,
McDonalds vs Burger King, etc. Large companies battling to be the most well
known competitor in the market. Its funny to look at how the companies play off
of each other’s marketing strategies. Look at these similar advertisements from
Burger King and McDonalds:
http://blog.bellotaestudio.com/sites/default/files/pictures/mcdonalds_hamburger_copia.jpg
http://theinspirationroom.com/daily/print/2010/9/burger_king_burger_typography.jpg
The
Burger King advertisement is trying to aim at a more sleek, burger-orientated
approach to its strategy. They emphasize a more real view of the burger, which
allows this food item to spark hunger in the people who come across this. The
most obvious thing that Burger King is doing in this advertisement is the
lettering that makes of the ingredients of the burger. This allows the
franchise to label their sandwich as opposed to the view being able to
associate their own words with what they see if, for example, the advertisement
was just a picture of the real burger itself. This advertisement also utilizes
ethos and pathos elements to get its point across. The name Burger King is a
very credible name internationally so they automatically grasp this by putting
their logo in the shadow of the burger. The words used in the advertisement
spark emotions of curiosity and hunger at first glance. They are targeting a
general audience that is probably under 22 years old.
Like Burger King, McDonalds is
trying to grasp a similar marketing strategy. Their advertisement is more
“professional” in a sense because it utilizes the same labeling idea on the ingredients;
however, the ingredients are listed and labeled as a more elite status. For
example, the words and font encompass a feeling of natural food, healthy, and
sleek. This can be seen through the way the lettuce is listed as “the
encyclopedia of salad” and the meat has a picture of a steak behind it. This
advertisement evokes an ethos and logos feeling to the person viewing it.
Obviously McDonalds is a reputable name in the fast food industry so they have
that going for them in any marketing situation. The new thing they are aiming
at in this is the natural and healthy feeling they exhibit through the pictures
and descriptions in the ingredients. This makes the viewer logically think this
burger isn’t that unhealthy for them, which is exactly what McDonalds is aiming
at.
Overall, the McDonalds advertisement
is targeting a more mature, wealthier audience as a result of the natural and
healthier approach they are taking towards marketing their burger. Burger King
is just trying to draw people in to the fact that their burger looks very good
in the advertisement from the bubble letter words that make up the burger. Both
of these advertisements are trying to move away from the actual item they are
selling by building the burger out of words instead of showing what it actually
looks like. This is where the idea of the subconscious marketing strategy comes
into play. People are aware that eating either of these burgers isn’t a
sustainable meal for their health and wellbeing, but if both of the companies
were doing it, the only thing there is to compare it to would be the other
company who is using the same techniques. The only visual left for people is
the fake burger made up of words that doesn’t look anything like what it would
if someone were to order it. People make the decision to get one of these items
based on how they perceive it from the advertisement. The problem with this is
that neither of these products offers any of the ideals portrayed in the
advertisements.
The appeals displayed in these
advertisements offer a nice glimpse of food and culture values as a result of
the idea that we as consumers don’t necessarily take into account what we are
eating. We can be influenced by how the items are presented to us instead of
the actual nutritional value or sustainable development of the product. This is
why food marketing and advertisement is so influential in our society today.
You do a good job of analyzing the advertising strategies both companies use to promote their product. I really like the idea of the Burger King ad's purpose being to label itself rather than letting a consumer formulate their own ideas. Your analysis of purpose and audience seems on point to me. Your postulation about cultural values is that we can care more about how things are presented to us rather than what they're actually made of. This is a great idea, I do think that you could expand on that a little though, as that part of the essay is fairly brief. Explain what you mean a little more using your ads or further examples. Overall, it was a good essay and enjoyable to read!
ReplyDeleteThese two ads are very interesting, I wonder which one came first! They have almost identical ideas, and go extremely well together for this analysis. I think your analysis was very good, and related one ad back to the other quite well. One thing I might ad is tying in the tagline for McDonalds, The [M], A Sandwich For Experts." I think will broaden your analysis even further as I think it ties back to their ethos appeal most of all, or perhaps the ethos of their audience since it pertains to them. It was good that you brought in the use of ethos and logos where you did, but you might be able to expand on those points as well. I think these are two really neat ads, good job finding two that were so similar!
ReplyDelete